[PD] question regarding symboltable

[hans w. koch]

thanks for confirming, johannes!

for now i settled for breaking up the numbers in chunks of 6 digits without using makefilename.
but i agree:
> on the long run, we should just improve the way numbers are written to disk.

best

hans


> Am 24.09.2020 um 13:53 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
> 
> On 2020-09-24 10:40, hans w. koch wrote:
>> has this changed somehow since or should it still be avoided?
> 
> nothing changed.
> 
>> or is there a way to “flush” the symboltable at runtime?
> 
> no.
> 
> [makefilename] is definitely the wrong tool to solve the problem
> (although it's probably the one that is available right now, in Pd-vanilla).
> 
> on the long run, we should just improve the way numbers are written to disk.
> 
> gfadsrm
> IOhannes
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list