[PD] multichannel vs many stereo writesf objects?

[Jaime Oliver]

Hola Fede,

I have now turned to recording stuff in ardour using JACK, thereby
relieving Pd from spending any resources writing files.

best,

J

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:00 PM Fede Camara Halac <camarafede at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> What is more efficient for recording, say, a +15 minute 16 channel
> performance: a single writesf with 16 channels or 8 writesf object with 2
> channels each?
>
> Bonus question: What if I place a stereo writesf inside a patch and run 8
> separate pd~ objects?
>
> The context: recording network performance using Netty McNetface. This is
> why I'm trying to reduce as much processing from the main patch while
> staying within pd-land. (Routing multichannel audio out to another daw
> would be an option that I'm not considering right now)
>
> Thanks!
>
> f
> fdch.github.io
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


-- 
**********************
Jaime E Oliver LR
www.jaimeoliver.pe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200928/bcf77374/attachment-0001.html>