[PD] Pd 64 bits precision "for real"?

[Martin Peach]

or dippidydoo, dpd2

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 7:24 AM Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think "pd64" is fine, otherwise the list get's catchy/dumb:
>
> pdpd (haha)
> pd two-times
> pd again
> pd double trouble
> pd dubs'
> pd-sharp (less rounding)
> ...
>
> I would fine "dppd" confusing unless we go ahead and re-brand ala "pd vanilla" and "double-dipped pd" aka "dppd"...
>
> On Nov 23, 2020, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:22:49 +0100
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd 64 bits precision "for real"?
> Message-ID: <57e459d6-e8d1-516c-da37-af88912aaf21 at iem.at>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 11/23/20 12:25 AM, Martin Peach wrote:
>
> It should be named dppd to avoid confusion imho.
>
>
> or pddp (or is that already taken?)
>
> when csound switched to double precision they renamed things to
> "csound64" (with "things" being at least the libraries that hold the
> engine).
>
> so i like pd64 better, as it is obvious that this is still Pd (and not
> just some nice palindromic acronym).
>
> but anyhow, yes: we probably need a catchy name.
>
> fgmadsr
> IOhannes
>
>
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list