[PD] PD 64 bits precision "for real"?

jayrope jayrope at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 17:28:45 CET 2020


Thank you Martin,

so it does behave similar to OS9 versus OSX.
Well then, PDX or PD64.

I'd very much prefer for backwards compatibility, but double precision
is the way to go for better sound.

I suppose there'll be a way to import old patches? Export new patches to
32bit pd?

Both would really help to work on with present hardware (libpd-based)
for instance.

I hope i didn't miss this info in digests sent before. Get's a bit hard
to follow all of this sometimes.

Thank you again


On 11/24/20 16:07, Martin Peach wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 5:07 AM jayrope <jayrope at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why do we need _any_ name change?
>> Any obvious version jump would do it already, 0.6, no?
> 
> A 64-bit Pd would not be compatible with any previous version because
> all the memory structures would be differently sized, so any externals
> built for previous versions would crash. While any patches using
> vanilla objects would still work, unless a 64-bit version had some way
> of running 32-bit externals in parallel, it would be effectively a
> different program, not just a new version.
> 
> Martin
> 

-- 
jayrope
+++
jayrope.com
aircushionfinish.com
kliklak.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20201124/af1601aa/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list