[PD] PD 64 bits precision "for real"?
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Nov 24 17:42:59 CET 2020
Am 24. November 2020 17:28:45 MEZ schrieb jayrope <jayrope at gmail.com>:
> Thank you Martin,
>
> so it does behave similar to OS9 versus OSX.
> Well then, PDX or PD64.
>
> I'd very much prefer for backwards compatibility, but double precision
> is the way to go for better sound.
>
> I suppose there'll be a way to import old patches? Export new patches
> to
> 32bit pd?
>
as Christof already said, patches are blissfully unaware of Pd's number representation (whether it's single or double precision).
they are even unaware of the processor architecture! (hey you can run a Pd patch created on win10 on a raspberry pi!)
there won't be a way to just "save" externals with doubles precision support. they need explicit recompilation.
mfg.hft.fsl
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list