[PD] Question about Netty McNetface

Rick Snow ricksnow at gmail.com
Tue Dec 15 16:17:12 CET 2020


Thank you, Miller.  

In terms of streaming the result, would it be better to stream from the same computer on which the server is running or to run a different computer to do the streaming?  Or would there be no discernible difference?  We will run the video via zoom and stream via OBS.  

I’m very happy to hear about anyone’s experiences with this if they would like to share for the list archive.

Cheers,
Rick



> On Dec 14, 2020, at 9:36 PM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> 
> Best to run your own - there's no way to make sure there's only one group
> at a time trying to use the server running on foo.  And anyhow, assuming you're
> mostly physically in New Orleans, you'll probably get better latency if you
> crank up a server locally.
> 
> cheers
> Miller
> 
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:28:23PM -0600, Rick Snow wrote:
>> Hello List,
>> 
>> I???m working on getting 6-10 performers together using Netty McNetface.  In reading the documentation I understand that for Quacktrip the connections between the computers is direct but for Netty McNetface the connection goes through the computer running the Netty-mcserver.pd patch.  Can the computer running the server still use the foo.ucsd.edu <http://foo.ucsd.edu/> server address or does it need to broadcast its own IP address to get best quality audio?
>> 
>> Thanks for your advice!
>> Rick
>> 
>> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!!Mih3wA!QaEsMIVr6xD228403reP5TEtbjX9_QDg5vXvQJ4D36iQp3QWp0Y6BlwxFSbB$ 
> 






More information about the Pd-list mailing list