[PD] OSC problem

Csaba Láng langcsaba at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 11:46:46 CET 2021


Scott,

thanks for the Unity part suggestions. Screenshots are welcome, patch is
even better :)
Just to be clear you suggest both solution in one time: extOSC and the
udpreceive - oscars, or the udprevceive works already with the OSC I use
now from Unity.

Will come back if tested the extOSC package for Unity, probably in 12 hours.

Best,

Popesz

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:55 AM Scott R. Looney <scottrlooney at gmail.com>
wrote:

> hi Csaba - i have done a fair amount of work with OSC in Unity and i
> highly recommend the extOSC plugin for this (it's free).
> https://github.com/Iam1337/extOSC
>
> homemade OSC sounds cool but there are a lot of flavors and not all of
> them play well with PD. i tried a number of options and what worked on
> receive in PD was the following:
>
> [iemnet/udpreceive] (with the port set at loadbang) -> [oscparse] - [list
> trim] and then [route] to send it places.
>
> what worked on send to Unity was this: [oscformat (parameter) (value)] ->
> [list prepend send] -> [list trim] -> [netsend -u -b] (with the connect
> message to the address and port on loadbang).
>
> i'm sure that might sound kludgy and terrible to experienced folks but the
> receiving setup works perfectly for me and [netreceive] absolutely did NOT
> work, under any configuration. haven't tested the sending option but it did
> work in the past.
>
> happy to include a screenshot if you need it.
>
> best,
> scott
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:09 AM Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 09:52 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>
>> > PS: it would help *tremendously* if you could mention what you are
>> > actually using to receive OSC.
>>
>> But also what you are using for _sending_ OSC messages. I gather you
>> wrote something in Unity. Are you sending in UDP or TCP? If you are
>> unsure what do you use, I'd go for UDP as it less complex and it is
>> much more common in OSC world. Also, switching transport protocols
>> means switching whole concepts. My advice is to stick with one and be
>> clear about what you use.
>>
>> Roman
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210209/c2e1ec11/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list