[PD] detect dependencies from patch

Roman Haefeli reduzent at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 08:57:42 CET 2021

On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 14:51 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> well, I guess that's why you have declare for.

Sure. What I mean is there is no introspection about what [declare]
actually did. 

> and I once proposed this 
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/281

That is the discussion I was looking for. Thanks for the pointer.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210224/172d8316/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list