[PD] Patterns for Pd Documentation
reduzent at gmail.com
Tue May 25 18:14:50 CEST 2021
On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 12:41 -0300, Esteban Viveros wrote:
> About the point 2. It is addressed to open the scope of feedbacks. I
> think that the effort to create a new standard for documentation
> should cover as many opinions as possible at first (like this
> one). It's like a brainstorm. Then we will try to systematize and
> organize the material we have in order to constitute a form that
> satisfies everyone as much as possible with easy maintenance, open to
While what you says makes sense in my eyes, I'm curious to know what
triggered you to start this effort. I'm asking because I would like to
understand what different notions of "good documentation" are.
Personally, I like the self-contained nature of Pd with almost no
external dependencies. I'd welcome if this quality is considered while
evaluating documentation improvements.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Pd-list