[PD] Patterns for Pd Documentation

Roman Haefeli reduzent at gmail.com
Tue May 25 18:14:50 CEST 2021

On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 12:41 -0300, Esteban Viveros wrote:
> > 
> About the point 2. It is addressed to open the scope of feedbacks. I
> think that the effort to create a new standard for documentation
> should cover as many opinions as possible at first (like this
> one). It's like a brainstorm. Then we will try to systematize and
> organize the material we have in order to constitute a form that
> satisfies everyone as much as possible with easy maintenance, open to
> collaborations.

While what you says makes sense in my eyes, I'm curious to know what
triggered you to start this effort. I'm asking because I would like to
understand what different notions of "good documentation" are.
Personally, I like the self-contained nature of Pd with almost no
external dependencies. I'd welcome if this quality is considered while
evaluating documentation improvements.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210525/27ae7adb/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list