[PD] UDP server with Pd

[Dan Wilcox]

Ah yes, you are right. [timeout( is for TCP. I think I got that mixed up with UDP previously closing itself after some sort of unknown host return etc which we removed to make it "fire and forget."

> On Jun 4, 2021, at 4:17 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:17:29 +0200
> From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com <mailto:reduzent at gmail.com>>
> To: Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com <mailto:danomatika at gmail.com>>
> Cc: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at lists.iem.at>>
> Subject: Re: [PD] UDP server with Pd
> Message-ID: <2aed329cdb23e198c96f658f05a81ce4f276bf84.camel at gmail.com <mailto:2aed329cdb23e198c96f658f05a81ce4f276bf84.camel at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 19:51 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>> You could try a longer connection timeout via the [timeout f(
>> message. 
> 
> Isn't the 'timeout' method only affecting TCP sessions? In UDP nothing
> at all is sent when using 'connect' method. It internally sets
> destination address and port, I believe.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210604/24f8c762/attachment-0001.htm>