[PD] develop testing branch was: Find last error

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Tue Jun 15 12:11:34 CEST 2021

Slightly off-topic:

IOhannes, et al should we consider making a develop-testing style branch for integrating a number of PRs and the current develop branch for extended testing? I'd also like to have my sound file update branch get more use and it would then be an easier sell for Pd 0.52 etc...

> On Jun 15, 2021, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:41:18 +0200
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>>
> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Find last error
> Message-ID: <564ebac4-d195-4cea-0297-3c2f983e27f3 at iem.at <mailto:564ebac4-d195-4cea-0297-3c2f983e27f3 at iem.at>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
> On 6/15/21 9:28 AM, Jo?o Pais wrote:
>> Hi,
>> in parallel to the error discussion going on: the already existing "find 
>> last error" function can be quite helpful, but it doesn't always work. I 
>> didn't find any documentation for it (maybe I didn't search long 
>> enough), is it marked somewhere in which situations it works, and in 
>> which situations it doesn't?
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/965 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/965>
>> From the discussion going on, I imagine this function should not be 
>> connected with the new object, as they have completely different 
>> functions, correct?
> yes. the two are orthogonal.
> fmgasdr
> IOhannes

Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210615/d226efd8/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list