[PD] why not adding other boxes like gatom from objects?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

but you can create gatoms with dynamic patching, right?

Em sex., 19 de nov. de 2021 às 17:11, Fede Camara Halac <
camarafede at gmail.com> escreveu:

>
> Here's my 2 cents, if I understand porres' question right.
>
> Personally, I always type iemgui names, to be honest. But, I think typing
> "floatatom" or "symbolatom" (or "listbox") into an object would be
> cumbersome at first glance, and we would need an alias to make it worth. In
> that sense, their shortcut is just the way to go.
>
> However, there are some cases where a typed gatom is what you need; for
> example, if you are on autopatch and want a gatom without mouse input, or
> dynamic patching stuff.
>
> On that note, typing something like "arraygraph" into an object would put
> an array on the canvas (as you would from the menu, or the shortcut)
>
> And finally, to complicate things further, arguments would be also a nice
> feature to have in typed gatoms: limits, send/rcv, labels, or array name,
> size, etc
>
> Best,
>
> Fede
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20211119/ef8a5aa1/attachment-0001.htm>