[PD] documenting messages to/from Pd and dynamic patching

[Iain Duncan]

+1 to having them in the docs but clearly labelled as something along the
lines of "not in the public API - may change without notice". That kind of
stuff is really helpful to people coming up on the whole system to better
understand how it all works.

my two cents Canadian. :-)

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:15 PM Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Em sex., 26 de nov. de 2021 às 20:19, João Pais <jmmmpais at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> I don't see a mention to these messages: mouse, mouseup, mousedown,
>> relocate. And also all other messages related to gui stuff.
>>
>
> yeah, I didn't put it. It felt like something hard to document and for
> more extreme cases. And now that Christof says I should really keep out of
> this dark corner, I wonder if I did right.
>
>
>> It could also be clearly mentioned that subpatches receive messages sent
>> to pd-[subpatch], and abstractions are named [abstraction].pd (if I'm
>> recalling correctly) - unless there is a namecanvas used in those.
>>
>
> how isn't it clearly mentioned?
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20211126/c1f49eb1/attachment-0001.htm>