[PD] documenting messages to/from Pd and dynamic patching

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

I realize now how this can be useful and important to make abstractions
fire a loabdang if they are created via dynamic patching!

Well,  I added this information then, with examples.

Em dom., 28 de nov. de 2021 às 17:30, Alexandre Torres Porres <
porres at gmail.com> escreveu:

>
>
> Em dom., 28 de nov. de 2021 às 16:33, João Pais <jmmmpais at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> I think you didn't understand - if you have an abstraction called "abs1"
>> used in the patch, sending messages to pd-abs1 won't work. They need to be
>> sent to pd-abs1.pd - and that could be clearly named in the documentation.
>>
> Oh, I see! Yes, there's a very good reason I didn't put that in the
> documentation: I had no idea that's how it works :)
>
>
>> It is a quite peculiar situation,anyway.
>>
>
> Then I'll just add the remark that abstractions need ".pd", but you should
> most probably just use [namecanvas].
>
> thanks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20211128/af8298e1/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Pd-messages.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 22744 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20211128/af8298e1/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: namecanvas-help.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3693 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20211128/af8298e1/attachment-0003.obj>