[PD] A strange question (yet again)

[Dan Wilcox]

I have a vanilla spectroscope abstraction: g_spectroscope. It's pretty simple and good enough for showing a graph, not really for scientific precision. There are also update & dimension controls plus you can turn it off to save CPU.

https://github.com/danomatika/rc-patches/tree/master/rc <https://github.com/danomatika/rc-patches/tree/master/rc>

> On Jan 20, 2022, at 6:01 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:46:02 +0000
> From: Pierre Alexandre Tremblay <tremblap at gmail.com <mailto:tremblap at gmail.com>>
> To: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list at lists.iem.at>>
> Subject: [PD] A strange question (yet again)
> Message-ID: <12F096C2-A42D-42BA-8146-B784978F6464 at gmail.com <mailto:12F096C2-A42D-42BA-8146-B784978F6464 at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Sorry again for my obsessions with pd-vanilla which makes everything harder - this one might be impossible!
> 
> I?m trying to draw a spectrogram in pd-vanilla to match our waveform visualisation options in FluCoMa for Max and SuperCollider. I saw the example with the peaks in the documentation, and did myself a sort of grid of objects (arrays) but the former is not precise enough and the latter was clogging the machine as you might imagine?
> 
> As I am not the best Pd coder, although getting less worse by the day thanks to you all, I just want to confirm that it is definitely no possible in any other way than doing the structure of arrays of rectangles.
> 
> Any pointer welcome (pun intended again)
> 
> p

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20220120/ef3714b2/attachment.htm>