[PD] [sfinfo~]

[Miller Puckette]

Excellent - nothing to do then.  My favorite kind of dolist.

cheers
M

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 07:37:04PM +0000, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote:
> Wait - this is embarrassing, it seems that the left outlet still spits out the number of samples when there are no destination arrays so I should be golden…
> 
> I probably need a weekend. Sorry for the Friday night noise.
> 
> > On 28 Jan 2022, at 19:35, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > Yep, I can think of other reasons you'd want to know the size of a soundfile
> > in a Pd patch without having to read the whole thing in.
> > 
> > cheers
> > M
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 07:32:02PM +0000, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote:
> >>> I forgot is even simpler (no need for an array)
> >> 
> >> Oh la la this is embarrassing. I didn’t know one could not supply an array… but that way I don’t get the size of the file in frames.
> >> 
> >>> Are you doing stuff that "soundfiler" doesn't?  If so, it would be better to add to the soundfiler object than to add a new object with its own name.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Indeed Miller I’ll do a PR to add it at the end then. I get everything else with soundfiler
> >> 
> >> For info, I need the size of the sum of my sound files in frames and in channels to allocate the right size once. I do that in Max and SC doing 2 passes, once to read the headers and accumulate what I need in both dimensions (and capture the SR at the same time) then I assign then I read and copy. For large corpora, this is useful.
> >> 
> >> So the proposal is not so big and bold as my first email… but still a needed feature.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> > 
>