[PD] ​Re: phasor~ phase reset detection

Samuel Burt composer.samuel.burt at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 01:06:43 CET 2022


Here's how I like to do it these days:

[phasor~]
 |
[expr~ $v1 < 0.5]
 |
[snapshot~] (with [bang~]
 |
[change]
 |
[sel 1]
 |
BANG!

If you need it to be sample accurate, you can set [block~ 1].

Even better if you can keep it all in the signal domain and skip the
[snapshot~], but it depends on your purpose.

Sam



> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi there,
> I assume this has been discussed many times before but...what could be
> simplest and most concise way to detect a phase reset of a phasor~ with
> only plain vanilla objects?
> I only need one bang when it goes back to 0.
> It seems I should need snapshot~ and fexpr~ which is not that elegant...
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20220316/37d4b25a/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20220316/118dde70/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list