[PD] Shared memory for [pd~] processes

[William Brent]

It's available as 'shmem' via deken.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 11:58 AM Phil Stone <pksmusic at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I’ve converted my old ‘polywavesynth’ to being able to spawn a new [pd~]
> process for its voice management, and that’s working really well. I can see
> the load spread to other cores for multiple synthesizers, and after working
> out some bugs, I’m really happy with this new capability.
>
>
>
> I have another old synthesizer, ‘polygrainsynth’ I’d like to modify
> similarly. It has a large array which is displayed (and can be edited) in
> the top-level process. The array is used by the individual voices, which
> would be in a subprocess. Is there a way to share that array between the
> parent process and the sub-[pd~] process?
>
>
>
> I searched the archives and found mention of ‘share-mem’ by Cyrille Henry
> back in 2012:
> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-11/098714.html but I
> can’t find any other mention of it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> Phil Stone
>
> Davis, California USA
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


-- 
William Brent

“Great minds flock together”
Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century

www.conflations.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20230201/35d98e63/attachment.htm>