[PD] Shared memory for [pd~] processes

[Phil Stone]

Oh, that’s fantastic. Thanks, Cyrille (and William)!


Phil

From: Pd-list <pd-list-bounces at lists.iem.at> on behalf of cyrille henry <ch at chnry.net>
Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:18 AM
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at <Pd-list at lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD] Shared memory for [pd~] processes
Hello Phil,

shmem have been develop for this purpose, and it still works great for this purpose...

I think you can install it from deken.

Cheers
C


Le 01/02/2023 à 17:56, Phil Stone a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> I’ve converted my old ‘polywavesynth’ to being able to spawn a new [pd~] process for its voice management, and that’s working really well. I can see the load spread to other cores for multiple synthesizers, and after working out some bugs, I’m really happy with this new capability.
>
> I have another old synthesizer, ‘polygrainsynth’ I’d like to modify similarly. It has a large array which is displayed (and can be edited) in the top-level process. The array is used by the individual voices, which would be in a subprocess. Is there a way to share that array between the parent process and the sub-[pd~] process?
>
> I searched the archives and found mention of ‘share-mem’ by Cyrille Henry back in 2012: https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-11/098714.html <https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-11/098714.html> but I can’t find any other mention of it.
>
> Best,
>
> Phil
>
> Phil Stone
>
> Davis, California USA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20230201/25e21f25/attachment-0001.htm>