[PD] pd~ set audio API on linux
Orm Finnendahl
orm.finnendahl at selma.hfmdk-frankfurt.de
Sun May 7 10:00:36 CEST 2023
Hi IOhannes, Christof,
in my use case the subprocesses don't need to receive/send audio to
the main process and pd~ seems to introduce additional latency so I
solved it by starting pd processes from the shell and communicating
to/from the main patch using OSC.
In any case it's good to know about mediasettings, that seems quite
useful.
--
Orm
Am Samstag, den 06. Mai 2023 um 10:18:22 Uhr (+0200) schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
> Am 5. Mai 2023 21:57:37 MESZ schrieb Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com>:
> >
> >[pd~] is designed to pipe audio through the subprocess. The code does not (or rather should not) allow the subprocess to use a real audio device. Ideally, we should disable the "audio settings" and audio API entries in the "Media" menu for subprocesses, as they don't have any meaning in this context.
>
> And just for the record: of course Christof is right (like always), and with my previous answer I did not want that "mediasettings" would make things to start working magically.
> Only if changing the audio backend is possible somehow, then "mediasettings" allowed you to do so programmatically and with a well-defined interface.
>
>
> mfg.sfg.jfd
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list