[ot] Re: Problems passing symbols to abstractions

[_-¯-_]

id LAA00941
Sender: SmartList <list at iem.kug.ac.at>
Resent-Message-ID: <igh2sD.A.d_H.b6T95 at iem.kug.ac.at>
Resent-From: pd-ot at iem.mhsg.ac.at
X-Mailing-List: <pd-ot at iem.mhsg.ac.at> unarchived
X-Loop: pd-ot at iem.mhsg.ac.at
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: SmartList <list at iem.kug.ac.at>
Resent-Bcc:
Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:47:39 +0200
Content-Length: 728
Lines: 22
Status: RO
X-Mozilla-Status: 8001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39e5ad050000019b

 |Thanks for the patch, whoever you are, Mr. or Ms. underscore :-).
 |Incidently, I am starting to get an impression of a kind of techno-geek
 |subculture among the PD users (writing in geek characters, not revealing
 |their name, etc). Interesting ...

<quote>
It's like a whole new language, isn't it? A whole new language for the
cyber-age. The futuristic multi-media landscape of digital electronics
that will one day connect the world in a seamless 'net' of invisible
threads. With square brackets and artfully-abbreviated words we can face
the 'wired age' without fear of appearing old-fashioned. Rad!

[ap]
</quote>

-- 
X           Þ           V           ·           o           r           6