[PD] video midi

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>First let me explain (and perhaps apologize in advance) that part of my
>motivation for this project was just to see if it could be done, and for
>the thrill of doing it.  So my "abandoning" of GEM may have been
>premature.  However, looking back I do feel there are some differences
>about my system that I like, though other's opinions may differ.

mine does not.


>> Or put the other way, what was it that you didn't like about them
>> GEM way ?

dont m9nd guenter - he hasnt a clue.


>My only complaint (and it's more of a preference) is that GEM pix objects
>support multiple types of video data (RGB and grey).  I feel it adds a
>good deal of flexibility to a system when all the data streams are
>essentially the same and completely interchangable.  In hindsight, I could
>get such behaviour from GEM by simply writing deinterleave and interleave
>objects (I couldn't find any, but I may be missing something.)
>
>All my objects are fairly well modularized, and having just now revisited
>the GEM source code, it shouldn't be too much work to wrap them in the pix
>style.


query - why would one want 2 wrap them in gem - which is arguably the
most idiotic + rigid gfx system developed +?

= 01 objekt to bridge if desired mais otherwise ...
gem = simply.INFERIOR

ciao.nn