[PD] ch!lled

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

david casal <D.Casal at uea.ac.uk> - 01 extra destitute + analphabet kr!!!ket


>On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 integer at www.god-emil.dk wrote:
>
>> pd isnt free. [perhaps if one is 99 prozent brain free]
>
>sweeping statements are polluting and opinions are cheap. you advertise
>like coca-cola.

gradually ...
coming to you.

 
>> is pd better +? well ___... different shades of  u gli ness.
>> most of the data worth anything has been authored by `3rd parties`.
>
>it's called open source collaboration. see gnu/linux.
>
>> overall max + msp + pd + gem = rigid \ uneventful + ultra ugggggllllllyy xy re
>fuse.
>> as most everything else in the digital domain.
>
>thanks to Thomas Grill + Larry Troxler, you can write Python and Scheme
>within PD, which makes it quite the opposite of 'rigid', 

you read -
max + msp + pd + gem = rigid \ uneventful + ultra ugggggllllllyy xy refuse.
most of the data worth anything has been authored by `3rd parties`.



>and in fact
>offers the user a way to do almost anything,

i do not wish to see anything
just what you have lifed.

ready +?



>wihout paying a license fee
>(as opposed to max, NATO, etc.). 

pardon me western kriiket.
nato.0+55 is not licensed.
nor was it authored with korporat fascist funds
stolen from ost.europa.

i read.


>This means 'ugly' and 'rigid' now depend
>on you state of mind and skills as a programmer, not on the framework.

ugly + rigid depend on one's childhood.
any fool [possibly you] kan program and most do.


>the real refuse of the 'digital domain' are the ultra-opinionated
>pseudocharacters who pile hipocritical releases of
>their own commercial, cryptically wonderful software, and who blame the
>tools to appear to be the cool, alternative solution.
>
>get on with it. 

da. i pour a medium sized bowl of ice on your coca-cola straw


>dc

superlative british pedagogie progeny