[PD-ot] blogger.com

[Kyle Klipowicz]

You are correct, I didn't take time to even look at the site, but
thought it was similar to some other mailing list aggregators I've
seen. It has no benefit whatsoever.

Sorry for not examining more closely before responding!

~Kyle

On 1/24/07, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> > I don't mean to be annoying or anything, but I don't understand the
> > problem here.  What harm is done if a public list like this is
> > archived in other formats?  Anyone can subscribe, the archives are
> > freely searchable and downloadable on the iem.at site.  I am having a
> > hard time seeing any violation of privacy if someone mirrors the
> > public archive.
>
> I think, posting pd-list mails to a blog site is something different
> from the official (iem) and semi-official (elists.com, gmane)
> archives.
>
> Did you take a look at the respective blogger site?
> http://pdlist.blogspot.com/ Did you read the comments? It's pure
> blogspam, which is riding piggyback on content generated by the pd
> community. This definitely is not a context I would want my texts to
> appear, so I'm glad IOhannes brough this up again and finally
> suspended what I consider exploitation of the pd-list.
>
> Plus: blogger.com is not even taking the small anti-spam measurements
> gmane uses: You can find verbatim email addresses in the blog entries,
> whereas gmane at least semi-hides it with <at>.
>
> Ciao
> --
>  Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-ot mailing list
> PD-ot at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-ot
>


-- 

http://theradioproject.com
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO