[PD-ot] USwater and the convention
marius schebella
marius.schebella at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 18:44:57 CEST 2007
it is a difference if the average user cannot tell the difference or if
you have no control at all...
in EU water must not be insanitary and the standards are high. for a
long time austrian mineral water had to show all included minerals and a
chemical analysis on the label, and that does not have to be older than
1 or 2 years.
http://www.geo.tu-freiberg.de/hydro/vorl_portal/gwb/mw_MTV-0905.pdf
marius.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Brilliant, thanks for posting. I think Europe's bottled water could
> use some of the same treatment. I wonder how many tap water
> carbonation and mineralization (i.e. table salt ;) plants there are
> with alpine names.
>
> .hc
>
> On Oct 2, 2007, at 9:32 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> this video was posted at the LAC list.
>> it somehow reminded me on a discussion we had at the pd~con07 about
>> chlorinated tap water in the US and canada.
>>
>> http://youtube.com/watch?v=XfPAjUvvnIc
>>
>>
>> mfga.sdr
>> IOhannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-ot mailing list
>> PD-ot at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-ot
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic.
> It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and
> expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war
> on terrorism. - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-ot mailing list
> PD-ot at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-ot
>
More information about the PD-ot
mailing list