[PD-ot] Thoughts on live coding visuals in Pure Data

dreamer dreamer at puikheid.nl
Sun May 11 05:44:10 CEST 2014


In understand how these missing features can be particularly annoying while
live coding, but even with normal Pd development I can see how these could
be a great enhancement! Looking forward to them.

Nice exploration of live GEM stuff by the way.


On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Antonio Roberts
<antonio at hellocatfood.com>wrote:

> These feature requests have now been added
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/feature-requests/137/
> https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/feature-requests/136/
>
> On 5 May 2014 17:17, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 2014-05-05 18:09, Antonio Roberts wrote:
> >>> whatever you think is a reasonable feature, is reasonable for at
> >>> least one person (yourself), which i think is good enough to post
> >>> as a feature request.
> >> True. I plan on adding them.
> >
> > cool.
> >
> >>
> >>> however, i'm a bit disappointed by statements like "this isn?t
> >>> mentioned at all on the bug tracker". first of all, these are not
> >>> bugs at all, but missing features at best.
> >> Better to refer to it as an issue? I know they're not bugs, but I
> >
> > yea, whatever.
> > i think i was just trying to build some suspense before telling you to
> > create a issue/ticket/feature-request.
> > (though i think that "feature request" covers request for missing
> > features pretty well :-))
> >
> >>
> >>> btw, i found inserting objects not to be such a big deal: i'm
> >>> mostly live-coding audio in Pd (and btw, i insist on calling it
> >>> live-coding, rather than "live-patching"...but this is probably
> >>> because i think that i do write code rather than merely stacking
> >>> objects together), and i found that it is entirely possible to
> >>> re-wire audio-signals without lengthy silences. when doing
> >>> graphics only this problem appears to be even less prominent.
> >
> >> Correct, but with code/object insertion this wouldn't be an issue
> >> at all and there would be no blackouts.
> >
> > what i meant is: it's easy to train your patching habits so that you
> > have virtually no blackouts.
> > and yes: having an auto-insert would allow you to achieve the same
> > without training, so it's clearly better.
> >
> >
> > fgmasdr
> > IOhannes
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
> >
> > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTZ7mdAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4OsIP/A/WBTjR0X3jrJKnXMVseiKA
> > pIyl886YRjD1HH2hPoSS+cA5eq3SuOBaTNVCcS0cpTnA2QWUHoos8F8g7gy6yXKq
> > gL0NObuvhO0Y9g4P70AQqkjyWOlSdDCnAKPaZrEWmgH6+LzWNT+/N6VoRwth3T7F
> > jU8TsWu0iz6MbGVQWhHuUTAK2xFhyIdXtwTWan8YCizRoIqPE5no1ydMEZNObcvN
> > SXbYddYkQusnHayPNEME7M1xDX0dKX4nUv2fL1CLs+GIRNGawqAtJhNTEkkV+IHW
> > fLjGmCyzYBcnBsKC7W5ZWqxiMnojH3Rb0ufuZmedY6Fqsy7eaTecVmybd1vB027I
> > ioCUzuLJJm2tREAQ6u9JPjd/1NNfxBWyuRBnkXzEsCyI1Ie586in39aQhOWN9vP0
> > rq08Fz5LrZ7tHqIJzOt40wpKM+5CHxZoeqgDmwvqS5ta8Ff9Lsk5p78qYAtUqh28
> > YuuOLeKilARITjvf5mpEpF1lOFT55g3xDriofYKa7/nC5dAhKkTXlMRM8+gf/1B5
> > 2+V/Jd2eQmMrk1XszGaO/cW/F4DdEFtnSvFXPoHE28Axku9g6BF6r5gLUpSyJjjx
> > 1lvpRauExleiM/uMbL/UzqxvfBgsUGSUVXy9Kubc8/jUFmtB7zG14N41gNhiyh91
> > zJ+RMZzUwmh/5D6yCtr6
> > =AeGY
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-ot mailing list
> > Pd-ot at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-ot
>
>
>
> --
> ============================
> antonio at hellocatfood.com
> http://www.hellocatfood.com
> ============================
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-ot mailing list
> Pd-ot at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-ot
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-ot/attachments/20140511/b2e30508/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-ot mailing list