[Pdweb] http://pure-data.iem.at/ doesn't work
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Wed May 19 02:28:19 CEST 2004
First off, thanks Winfried for doing all of this work, it can be
annoying and thankless.
Only a couple things actually need a wiki. I am guessing that a lot of
the stuff in the old pd wiki could be migrated to a plone-style page, or
is outdated and no longer necessary. As for the current site, the only
wiki that I think is still used is the FAQ, but its just one page, so it
should be easy to migrate to a ZWiki.
If you are willing to do the work, I think Plone2 sounds a lot nicer, so
I would vote a) then b). I tested test.puredata.info and its quite a
bit faster. Nice. The FAQ is of course broken, but otherwise, I
couldn't see anything wrong.
.hc
Winfried Ritsch wrote:
>Hello,
>
> Migrating PD
>
>
> I have tried to migrate PD-Site:
>
> There is some problem to new Zope 2-7-0 + CMF-1.4.4 + Plone 2.0.2:
>
> - Plone does not work because Plone1.0.3 has other templates....
>
> - CMFWiki is not working at all
>
> Second approach zope 2.6.4 + CMF-1.3.3 + Plone 1.0.5
>
> Site works: please test also !!! -> http://test.puredata.info/
> (data one week old just for testing)
>
> -except edit on CMFWiki
>
>
>So on old plone CMFWiki produrct can be installed but not working as it should
>and on new zope cmfwiki is not working at all and also Ploneskin is to be
>migrated,
>
>Solutions:
>
> a) I think we should first migrate all CMFWiki to ZWiki
>
>
> b) If we want the new Plone2:
>
> - which I find more powerful and
>
> - Zope 2.7 which has more performance
>
> - and also runs completly under the user zoper, where I can give you
> the login, so you can Install any Product you want.
>
> we should set up a new plone and just fill in the
>
> logo and make a new design... if somebody want, which is much more
> easier with plone2.0.x
>
>
>What should I do ? only a or a than b)
>
>
>mfg winfried
>
>
>PS:
> There is a skinswitcher at plone2.0 which can switch skins by domain.
>
>Any domain mapped on puredata.info whould relsoved so that the domainname
>stays if just somebody tells us to do so ?
>
>Am Dienstag, 18. Mai 2004 15:21 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
>
>
>>Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ok, good to know.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>pure-data.info is hans's backup that is pointing to 193.170.191.182,
>>>>but is not handled correctly by the virtual-host directive - that is
>>>>why you see a small "APACHE"-site
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Actually, I have pure-data.info set up on my nameservers to go to my
>>>server, which then redirects it to pure-data.iem.at. I guess IEM has
>>>pure-data.info set up on their nameservers, so only internally is it
>>>directed to 193.170.191.182.
>>>
>>>
>>absolutely right.
>>i have set up both "pure-data.info" and "puredata.info" (which where
>>identical) at our nameserver before wini had registered one of them; and
>>i hadn't yet removed the pure-data.info.
>>
>>anyhow, i have removed it right now from our servers and now it works as
>>expected (puredata.info gives the proxy error and pure-data.info shows
>>pure-data.iem.at)
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>mfg.asd.r
>>IOhannes
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Pdweb mailing list
>>Pdweb at iem.at
>>http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdweb
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the pdweb
mailing list