[Pdweb] puredata.info/.org

[Kyle Klipowicz]

Here is a list of sites that use Plone.

http://plone.org/about/sites/

I was really surprised and pleased by the Creative Commons page:
http://creativecommons.org/

~Kyle

On 10/23/06, Adrian <nordbaer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ;) Good. Who was the guy who overed a graphical skin for plone? Not
> the implementation, only a layout. There are good tutorials on the
> plone site, and plone.net is a realy nice site which shows what is
> possible with plone skinning.
>
> I'm happy that i found at least some people who share the same opinion
> as i do :D
>
> On 10/23/06, Kyle Klipowicz <kyleklip at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just wanted to shout out:
> > I'm on this list now too, although I know NOTHING about plone!
> >
> > ~Kyle
> >
> >
> > On 10/21/06, Steffen < stffn at dibidut.dk> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21/10/2006, at 22.28, Adrian wrote:
> > >
> > > > this is a mere echo mail: i want to check how alive this list is.
> > >
> > > check.
> > >
> > > > are there people willing to do a plone-skin? (look at plone.net to
> see
> > > > what is possible) because changing from plone to something else is
> not
> > > > an option i think. to much work. to much lose.
> > >
> > > i think grafical changes are a good start. But i also think that
> > > structural changes and silk documentation are important to get the
> > > best out of it.
> > >
> > > I am, when i get some time, going to make a proposal. But there have,
> > > in my opinion already been made good suggestions. fx:
> > >
> > > Kyle wrote:
> > > > I really do enjoy the layout on the Processing site (http://
> > > > processing.org/), since it is very clean and has lots of pictures
> > > > and a big fat examples section on the front page.  If we are trying
> > > > to market Pd to new users, this is THE most important thing (as
> > > > previously asserted).
> > > >
> > > > I also enjoy their utilization of subdomains.  We could do this
> > > > with things like http://gem.puredata.org, http://
> > > > gridflow.puredata.org , http://pidip.puredata.org , etc.
> > > >
> > > > Also, it would be best if the forum was attached to the main
> > > > website by at least a prominent link/redirect, if not actually in
> > > > server space.  But we definitely need more pictures:  unless you're
> > > > trying to show off by running lynx, the internet is not a purely
> > > > textual medium.  Besides, the people who actually DO patch Pd
> > > > without a GUI probably aren't so interested in visiting a more
> > > > marketing-oriented site anyway.  Maybe we could do http://
> > > > nogui.puredata.org?
> > >
> > > Pete wote:
> > > > * What it is, in simple terminology
> > > > * What people are doing with it
> > > > * How to install it - where to find different versions, and a sub-
> > > > page with 'common problems' that people have when installing
> > > > * Some simple tutorials with patches (the first howto on the
> > > > current page is Miller's book!)
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pdweb mailing list
> > > pdweb at iem.at
> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://theradioproject.com
> > http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
> >
> > (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
> > (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
> > ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
> > _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
> > ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
>
>
> --
> another incomplete website: http://conficere.ch/pds
>



-- 

http://theradioproject.com
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pdweb/attachments/20061023/2dd74b5f/attachment.htm