[Pdweb] Pd-FAQ [was; Re: puredata.org survey]

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
>> Looking at other projects, things like an up-to-date FAQ would be  
>> nice. 
> 
> The current status of the FAQ bothers me for quite a while. It's
> ancient in parts and doesn't reflect anymore, what people really ask
> on pd-list. 
> 
> I made some changes and fixes today, but in the longer run I'd like to
> rework it a bit more. First thing to do would be to add sections to
> the FAQ, like "General Information", "Installing Pd", "Tips and
> Tricks" etc.
> 
> But before I work on this a bit more, I think the formatting question
> should be sorted out. For convenience a formatting with
> auto-TOC-building should or must be used. I won't require reST, which
> does it, if another format can do this as well, but I don't want to
> write a TOC manually anymore.

what do you think of the Gem-FAQ (http://gem.iem.at/documentation/faq)
i mean not on the actuality level, but on the system level.
each FAQ entry is kept separately and associated with one or several
categories.

mfgads.r
IOhannes