[PD-dev] branch names (was Re: figuring out how to get everything merged)

[Dan Wilcox]

I'm fine with branching master, (hard) resetting back to a previous point, merging/cherry-picking portaudio fixes, tagging 0.53-2, then doing a force push. As long as everyone knows ahead of time, we can do a force pull afterwards. Yes, it's best avoided, but is sometimes be needed.

Afterwards, maybe current development can be in the branch until ready, ie. feature/multi-channel or develop/0.54, etc? 

> On Feb 6, 2023, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:44:36 +0100
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>>
> To: pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: [PD-dev] branch names (was Re: figuring out how to get
> 	everything merged)
> Message-ID: <47a595e9-4e0a-12fb-1432-41803fc6c8a8 at iem.at <mailto:47a595e9-4e0a-12fb-1432-41803fc6c8a8 at iem.at>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
> 
> On 2/5/23 22:37, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
>> Yep, I originally made a "0.53" branch but then messed it up so badly
>> I had to start over - and thought it better to change the name to
>> avoid confusion.
> 
> i see.
> it seems like the "avoid confusion" did not utterly succeed though ;-)

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230206/20aab1fa/attachment-0001.htm>