[PD-dev] Pd running on external scheduler changed

[Christof Ressi]

Thanks for restoring my sanity :)

On 24.04.2024 14:24, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
> Christof,
>
> looking closer this looks like a false alarm.
>
> further testing showed that
>
> [loadbang]
> |
> [; pd dsp 1;(
>
> indeed not show dsp toggle ticked but actually dsp is running.
>
> if i do
>
> [; pd dsp 0;(
>
> and then
>
> [; pd dsp 1;(
>
> the toggle shows ticked.
>
> there might be just something in the initial loading. also note this 
> is using the 32bit tcl/tk coming from a normal self built latest Pd.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
>
>
> -- 
>
> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>
> On 24/04/2024 07:24, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
>> Ok, no rushing if you are traveling.
>>
>>> First, what exactly does "not work"? 
>>
>> ---
>> ;
>> pd dsp 1;
>> ---
>>
>> does not start dsp (the toggle in the main Pd window never gets to "on")
>>
>>> Second, these two message should obviously be equivalent. Are you 
>>> really sure that they behave differently?
>>
>> yes.
>>
>> [dsp 1(
>> |
>> [s pd]
>>
>> works.
>>
>>> If yes, that would be a bug in Pd's message system, not in my 
>>> scheduler updates.
>>
>> I could check that the messaging system for other receivers work like 
>> [; foo 3( works as expected with [r foo].
>>
>>> When I made the updates, I tried not to break the external scheduler 
>>> mechanism and checked that pd~ still works.
>>
>> yes. pd~ still works.
>>
>>> Maybe it's an issue in your scheduler implementation? 
>>
>> nothing changed in pdvst~ scheduler implementation (well yes, but 
>> using the unchanged version the issue is still there on current 
>> master Pd and not with Pd 0.54-1).
>>
>>> I'll need to have a look at your code, ...
>>
>> sure: 
>> https://git.nubegris.com.ar/lucarda/pdvst-0.52/src/branch/sq-fudi/vst-scheduler/vstschedlib.c
>>
>> you could also see the "master" branch but as mentioned it also 
>> exhibits the issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>>
>> On 24/04/2024 06:40, Christof Ressi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24.04.2024 09:45, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working with some new feature of pdvst~ 
>>>> (https://git.nubegris.com.ar/lucarda/pdvst-0.52/compare/master...sq-fudi) 
>>>> this runs Pd via external scheduler "vstscheduler.dll"
>>>>
>>>> I hit some strange issue with current Pd (Merge branch 
>>>> 'scheduler_fix' 2bea249)
>>>>
>>>> this message no longer works
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> ;
>>>> pd dsp 1;
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> while this one works
>>>>
>>>> [dsp 1(
>>>> |
>>>> [s pd]
>>>
>>> First, what exactly does "not work"? Second, these two message 
>>> should obviously be equivalent. Are you really sure that they behave 
>>> differently? If yes, that would be a bug in Pd's message system, not 
>>> in my scheduler updates.
>>>
>>> When I made the updates, I tried not to break the external scheduler 
>>> mechanism and checked that pd~ still works. Maybe it's an issue in 
>>> your scheduler implementation? I'll need to have a look at your 
>>> code, but I'm travelling right now.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> is not something I changed in pdvst~. Is something that only 
>>>> exhibits with the newest Pd.
>>>>
>>>> I can live with it but may be this is some "peak of iceberg" ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev