[ot] website tools [was: Re: Re[2]: [PD] pure-data.org]

[j.jj]

i vote for *wiki, your flavour.


>          < d V .  o 7 G
-- 

 |
 |ciao
 |
 |might run into problems finding a decent ISP.
 |fine with me. I'd probably prefer Zope but with Zope or Webware, we
 |So if enough people are found for a PHP solution, that's absoluetly
 |
 |language (that currently is useless inside Pd).
 |the future CMS is PHP, because I don't have time to learn another
 |direction. I just won't be of much help with the technical side, if
 |But I don't want to push things for a pure-data.org 2.0 in a certain
 |
 |that is. Webware has a great share of Java converts on board.
 |way" while I see Zope often doing things "the Zope way", whatever
 |to Zope and is written with a strong focus on doing things "the Python
 |doesn't always have to be Zope. Webware is very lightweight compared
 |You really should take a look into Webware then (webware.sf.net). It
 |
 |> pants)
 |> (since Python is my bag and I'd like to get into its web-publishing
 |> Just my 2p. I would be willing to help with a Python portal solution
 |>
 |> author/contribute. As simple as that.
 |> and PDF docs from simple XML, which anyone would be able to
 |> Forrest. For example, it has TODO and FAQ DTD's, and generates printable
 |> For documentation, however, I have yet to see anything as comprehensive as
 |>
 |> the short term and more inclusive.
 |> learn it, etc. However, a Python portal solution seems quicker, easier in
 |> that, I believe it would do the job provided there were people willing to
 |> swiss banks, vodafone, etc.). Personally, because I've seen it work like
 |> of them. It is being used in severe load-balancing situations (a couple of
 |> Yes, most are. Cocoon is no different, but is the fastest and most mature
 |
 |David Casal hat gesagt: // David Casal wrote:
 |Hallo,

[Frank Barknecht]->[[ot] website tools [was: Re: Re[2]: [PD]...