[PD] osc objects

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> > osc/route
> > osc/pack
> > osc/unpack
> I think these should be more descriptive.  They don't work exactly the same as
> the core versions, so they should have different, but similar, names.

Why should namespaces exist if they don't solve name conflicts?

> The suffix is fine, but it should be consistent across objects in the lib,
> like:
> [osc/packOSC]
> [osc/unpackOSC]
> [osc/routeOSC]

those names all contain "osc" twice. if the latter "OSC" can't be removed, 
then why not removing the leading "osc/" ?

 _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada