[PD] bang when phasor~ reaches 1

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:

> Cool! We've discovered something "very wrong".

Maybe not, read on.

> Here I get 
> 
> number     bcalc        ecalc        bcplx        ecplx
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 4          70           80           110          290
> 8          140          160          210          560
> 16         260          330          430          1130
> 32         560          660          1070         2300
> 64         1220         1490         3250         4720

Hm, you're right, with such small numbers I actually also get better
results for the builtins. I was only testing bigger numbers at first.

With a growing number of test objects I get a huge lead for [expr].
Here are some of my statistics (on a much faster machine):

num   bcplx  ecplx
-------------------
128     720  1170
256    2780  2320
512   10430  5800

Now I'm wondering, if something became "very wrong" with [expr] ...

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__