[PD] pdpedia classifications

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Fri Oct 19 18:00:08 CEST 2007

On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:51 AM, Nicolas Montgermont wrote:

> Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
>> I read it as something that used to work but not longer does with
>> newer version. That would either be deprecated or abandoned.
> That was my thinking, sorry for the approximate usage of "deprecated".
> This should be very useful to know until wich version an external  
> is kwown to work and to have a simple classification like:
> - working with last pd vanilla
> - working with last pd extended
> - others
> I think that nobody really minds installing a newer version if you  
> know the external you're looking for is working with it, but it's  
> annoying when you have to use older ones.
> After is the question of the OS but it's an important step to know  
> it's working with your version.
> We can also think of a "tag" if it's possible in wikis.

I think something like this in the status box would be useful:

Status:  deprecated (0.37.2)


Status: abandoned (0.33)

If there is more info, then a section could easily be added in the text.


> Greetings,
> Nicolas
> -- 
> Nicolas Montgermont
> http://nicomon.basseslumieres.org


If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20071019/e676e95c/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list