[PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Mon Sep 7 18:29:42 CEST 2015


that's the only difference I can think of, but you can also just switch
between tables, not sure how important this feature is, seems is just
something for possible fun anyway.
cheers

2015-09-07 4:52 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:

> On 2015-09-06 23:58, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > yeah, I was thinking about this versatility. I guess "better" isn't a
> good
> > word. I was thinking "more powerful"
>
> afaict, i would say it has a single feature that is trivial to implement
> for [FIR~] as well...
>
> and if the table data itself is static¹, then it should be pretty easy
> to get the desired behaviour with a wrapper abstraction around [FIR~]
> that copies the data with an offset into an internal proxy table.
>
>
> but well, if this is the only feature that makes [Buffir~] more powerful
> than [FIR~], i will tell thomas to add it.
>
> fgasdrm
> IOhannes
>
> ¹ that is: you don't continuously change the impulse response without
> telling the filter object
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150907/46be2003/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list