[PD] "G05.execution.order" issue (bug? just wrong?)

[i go bananas]

certainly you could call it "untrustworthy" though...cos there's no way of
telling creation order from the GUI, and cut and paste or other re-patching
is liable to open your patch to changes which would re-order things.

for all intents and purposes, you're best off thinking of it as totally
random.

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Joe White <white.joe4 at gmail.com> wrote:

> It might be a bit misleading to call this behaviour 'undefined'.
>
> As Alexandre points out, control execution is defined by the order the
> connections appear in the netlist and so have reliable results each time
> the patch is run.
>
> It's not really the same problem you have in other languages where there
> is a runtime ambiguity.
>
> And is probably more an issue with the Pd environment UI than the language
> specification.
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> On 7 September 2015 at 19:15, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
>
>> On 09/07/2015 08:01 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> > i hope this explains it.
>>
>> forgot this.
>>
>> gfmards
>> IOhannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150908/eda37209/attachment-0001.html>