[PD] "G05.execution.order" issue (bug? just wrong?)

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

wow, this is quite a technical and theoretical discussion, nice.

but, keeping it simple and trying to avoid this nitty gritty completely,
all I'm curious about is if I can *rely* on building a patch with order of
creation/connection for both data and audio without trigger and subpatches.

and by that, the question is: if i know what I'm doing in the patch in
order to force the behaviour I want, and the patch is working in the way
that I want because of that, and Ive saved the file and it is is now
behaving the way I want every time I open it, can I *rely* that it will
always open and work like that if no one edits the file changing the order
of connections and everything?

thanks

2015-09-08 9:15 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:

> On 2015-09-08 12:21, Joe White wrote:
> >  Technically it doesn't. You can remove and re-add an existing connection
> > and it could change the order.
> >
> > Re-instantiating objects does the same, I assume the GUI is removing the
> > object (and connection) and then re-connecting it back up.
>
>
> ah yes, stupid me.
>
> fgmasr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150908/9eb1f215/attachment.html>