[PD] Present and future of WebPd

[s p]

@julian and @chris :)

Thanks for the thought provoking message ;)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:

> Hi Seb,
>
> On 08/09/15 14:47, s p wrote:
>
>> so I chose pragmatism over purity
>>
>
> That makes a lot of sense. You thought carefully about the best
> implementation with regards to the tradeoffs - my apologies for not seeing
> that.
>
>  > I only hope to persuade you that faithfulness to Pd's output is
>> probably a feature that users will appreciate a lot.
>>
>> to conclude ... you don't need to persuade me of this :) I just think it
>> is more important to have something you can use at all. But the future
>> might be brighter, and maybe these two goals won't contradict each other
>> any more.
>>
>
> \o/
>
> You're absolutely right that a WebPd that can run some patches without
> 100% sample-level accuracy is better than one which can't run on many
> devices at all, and your new approach sounds like a win on all platforms.
>
> Thanks for your hard work on WebPd.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris.
>
> --
> http://mccormick.cx/
>



-- 

*Sébastien Piquemal*

 -----* @sebpiq*
 ----- http://github.com/sebpiq
 ----- http://funktion.fm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20150909/da21eeba/attachment-0001.html>