[GEM-dev] RGBA confusion...

[Jack]

OK nice. Thanx Iohannes, I will test it tomorrow with autobuild of Pd- 
ext.
++

Jack


Le 29 mai 08 à 13:49, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :

> Jack wrote:
>> Le 28 mai 08 à 21:24, zmoelnig at iem.at a écrit :
>>> Quoting Jack <jack at rybn.org>:
>>>
>>>> For info, [pix_film], [pix_movie], [pix_video] seem to work fine  
>>>> here
>>>> with Pd-extended (20080524) and GEM: ver: 0.91.0 'tigital'  on
>>>> PowerBook G4 (PowerPC) and MacOSX.4.11 (using 5.reference/Gem).
>>>
>>> so it is only [pix_image] that makes problems?
>> Yep, it seems.
>> Here a capture with [pix_image] and [pix_texture].
>>>
>>> does the alpha work too?
>> Yep, it work. With [pix_image], i get blue pixel (in my case,  
>> [pix_image] doesn't work). But with [pix_film], all is ok (normal  
>> too, because [pix_film] works fine for me).
>> ++
>
>
> i think i might have fixed it in the v0-91 branch now.
> at least i get consistent (and correct looking) behaviour on both  
> G5 and i386)
>
> either try out the new universal binary to be found at http:// 
> gem.iem.at/releases/0.91.0/ or wait for the next pd-extended build  
> (tomorrow)
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes