[GEM-dev] pix_image inefficient with ubuntu 9.10

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Nov 18 09:57:28 CET 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

cyrille henry wrote:
> hello Pierre,
> 
> yes, you are right, "thread 0" solve the problem. thanks

btw, i had the same problem recently on a ubuntu machine  (no idea which
version since i did not set it up; this was in september though).
but since i loaded some hundred images, i thought that creating 100
threads is probably not so ideal :-)



> i'm wondering why there is such difference with ubuntu 8.10
> 
> anyone?

since i was under time pressure i did not investigate any further.
so i really don't know (yet)


fmgasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAksDtvcACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTZ8gCgpE3+sP2Ipa4mxJN+N1XrdupE
ChwAoOvucmtal8IrMdM/qaFx2FnA0Cg6
=vqwj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the GEM-dev mailing list