[GEM-dev] pix_image inefficient with ubuntu 9.10
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Nov 18 09:57:28 CET 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
cyrille henry wrote:
> hello Pierre,
>
> yes, you are right, "thread 0" solve the problem. thanks
btw, i had the same problem recently on a ubuntu machine (no idea which
version since i did not set it up; this was in september though).
but since i loaded some hundred images, i thought that creating 100
threads is probably not so ideal :-)
> i'm wondering why there is such difference with ubuntu 8.10
>
> anyone?
since i was under time pressure i did not investigate any further.
so i really don't know (yet)
fmgasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksDtvcACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTZ8gCgpE3+sP2Ipa4mxJN+N1XrdupE
ChwAoOvucmtal8IrMdM/qaFx2FnA0Cg6
=vqwj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list