[GEM-dev] pix_image inefficient with ubuntu 9.10

cyrille henry ch at chnry.net
Wed Nov 18 11:15:35 CET 2009



IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> cyrille henry wrote:
>> hello Pierre,
>>
>> yes, you are right, "thread 0" solve the problem. thanks
> 
> btw, i had the same problem recently on a ubuntu machine  (no idea which
> version since i did not set it up; this was in september though).
> but since i loaded some hundred images, i thought that creating 100
> threads is probably not so ideal :-)
i had patch with 8.04 that loads hundred of images without problems...

> 
> 
> 
>> i'm wondering why there is such difference with ubuntu 8.10
>>
>> anyone?
> 
> since i was under time pressure i did not investigate any further.
> so i really don't know (yet)
ok. if you wish to investigate, tell me if there is somthing i can do to help.

Cyrille

> 
> 
> fmgasdr
> IOhannes
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAksDtvcACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTZ8gCgpE3+sP2Ipa4mxJN+N1XrdupE
> ChwAoOvucmtal8IrMdM/qaFx2FnA0Cg6
> =vqwj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 




More information about the GEM-dev mailing list