[GEM-dev] pix_image inefficient with ubuntu 9.10
cyrille henry
ch at chnry.net
Wed Nov 18 11:15:35 CET 2009
IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> cyrille henry wrote:
>> hello Pierre,
>>
>> yes, you are right, "thread 0" solve the problem. thanks
>
> btw, i had the same problem recently on a ubuntu machine (no idea which
> version since i did not set it up; this was in september though).
> but since i loaded some hundred images, i thought that creating 100
> threads is probably not so ideal :-)
i had patch with 8.04 that loads hundred of images without problems...
>
>
>
>> i'm wondering why there is such difference with ubuntu 8.10
>>
>> anyone?
>
> since i was under time pressure i did not investigate any further.
> so i really don't know (yet)
ok. if you wish to investigate, tell me if there is somthing i can do to help.
Cyrille
>
>
> fmgasdr
> IOhannes
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAksDtvcACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTZ8gCgpE3+sP2Ipa4mxJN+N1XrdupE
> ChwAoOvucmtal8IrMdM/qaFx2FnA0Cg6
> =vqwj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list