[GEM-dev] weirdeness

Jack jack at rybn.org
Mon Feb 14 12:42:57 CET 2011


It is strange to see the object [pix_blabla] created and get in the
console :
error: GemException: couldn't find 'blabla'.''
And a 'help' on this object and i get :
sorry, couldn't find help patch for "pix_freeframe.pd"
++

Jack




Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 12:36 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2011-02-14 12:06, cyrille henry wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > is it normal that every pix_blablabla object get instancied as a
> > pix_freeframe object?
> 
> yes this is normal.
> FreeFrame (and frei0r) also register loaders, so you can instantiate
> these effects as [pix_<pluginname>].
> 
> > (with a "error: GemException: couldn't find 'blablabla'.''")
> 
> could be that i increased verbosity with one of the last commits, so you
> actually notice that freeframe is involved (as opposed to the object
> simply failing to create)
> 
> just to make sure: freeframe/frei0r loaders should only take effect if
> there is actually such a plugin.
> e.g. if you create [pix_blabla] and there is no FreeFrame plugin named
> "blabla" but there is an abstraction pix_blabla.pd in your path, you
> should still end up with the abstraction.
> 
> fg
> asdrm
> IOhannes
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZE8QACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRjAQCgnI6g9PAF1BO8bOyImNY0zAgD
> v7gAoMlGvxC6mL6WXYhQGrW1lxvxuRTq
> =etwb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20110214/7c9f3208/attachment.pgp>


More information about the GEM-dev mailing list