[GEM-dev] [ pd-gem-Bugs-3435688 ] [pix_mask] not masking completely

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #3435688, was opened at 2011-11-09 10:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by maxn
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507079&aid=3435688&group_id=64325

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Pixes (pix_ objects)
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: max (maxn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: [pix_mask] not masking completely

Initial Comment:
pix_mask (at least on os x and  0.91.3) does not mask the pixels completely. workaround is to use pix_takealpha instead

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: max (maxn)
Date: 2011-11-11 07:52

Message:
tried on ver: 0.93.3 compiled: Nov 10 2011 and confirm that it has been
fixed. thank you IOhannes for the os x binary release, i was waiting for
that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-11-11 04:30

Message:
could you try 0.93.3?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Cyrille Henry (nusmuk)
Date: 2011-11-11 03:18

Message:
look like working for me. 
(ubuntu 64 bit, recent gem from git)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: max (maxn)
Date: 2011-11-11 02:40

Message:
further testing revealed that the issue is present in Gem 92.3 22 sept 2010
bot NOT in 0.91.3 May 30 2009! (the older version does work as expected)
screenshot, patch and mask fies are attached.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-11-10 01:20

Message:
please provide help-patches and screenshots illustrating your problem.

also note that 0.91 is really quite old.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507079&aid=3435688&group_id=64325