[GEM-dev] Frame rate on MacOsX

Antoine Villeret antoine.villeret at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 18:34:52 CET 2011


hello,

here I got stable 50 fps on Mac OS X with PdExtended 42.5 (Gem ver: 0.92.3)
and also with Pd Vanilla 0.43 and Gem ver: 0.93.git ddca887 (build on
11.11.11 at 11:11)

Mac OS X 10.6.8 on an unibody macbook pro 13" (intel core 2 duo 2,53 GHz)
and Nvidia Geforce 9400M

Hope this helps

Antoine

2011/11/25 cyrille henry <ch at chnry.net>

> hello,
>
> yes, it look like my programming style.
> data are filtered, so small jitter introduce by audio computation should
> not be visible.
>
> I've got a solid 50fps even when synchronize with a 60Hz screen. (on linux)
>
> c
>
>
> Le 25/11/2011 16:54, Jack a écrit :
>
>  Le 25/11/2011 13:34, cyrille henry a écrit :
>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> Gem is sync with pd data processing.
>>> gemhead send something only between audio bloc processing.
>>> using pd -noaudio will help fps stabilisation.
>>>
>> Hello Cyrille,
>>
>> Hmm, I have already tried with -noaudio on MacOSX but still get a
>> changing frame rate :
>> With [gemwin 50] and -noaudio, the frame rate starts at 50 fps then 15
>> seconds after goes to 60 fps and 30 seconds after goes back to 50 fps.
>> Very strange...
>>
>>
>>> i don't know how does realFPS works, did it measure time between last 2
>>> frame, or did it average data on more frames?
>>>
>> Here the abstraction (I think this is yours ?).
>> Thanx.
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>>
>>> c
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 21/11/2011 19:53, Jack a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am working on an installation on MacOsX.6.7 with Pd-extended 0.42.5
>>>> and Gem 0.92.3 (compiled Sep 22 2010).
>>>> The graphic card is a ATI Radeon HD 5770.
>>>> On this environment, i can't get a stable frame rate. With [gemwin 50],
>>>> i get sometimes with the abstraction [realFPS] : 60 fps (strange no ?) then
>>>> 5 seconds after 40 fps. Even when the scene is the same.
>>>> How can i obtain 60 fps when it is write [gemhead 50] ?
>>>> Someone has a similar problem ?
>>>> How can I fix it ?
>>>> Thanx.
>>>> ++
>>>>
>>>> Jack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/gem-dev<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/gem-dev<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/gem-dev<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/gem-dev<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20111125/ff5fc417/attachment.htm>


More information about the GEM-dev mailing list