[GEM-dev] help with glsl abstractions

[Nicolas Montgermont]

Le 02/09/13 12:55, Cyrille Henry a écrit :
>
> yes, we can imaging extending this objects collection for vertex, or 
> with function that is not yet possible with pix_ object.
> so having pix_ prefix on this objects is not a good idea imo.
>
What I had in mind is :
[pix_*_sl] ONLY for glsl abstraction that replace a corresponding 
[pix_*] object
and for example
[vertex_*_sl for shader dealing with vertex.
This way the abstractions are classed by fonctionnality instead of 
method (glsl).

But I get your point and it's surely easier your way.
Nevertheless, one can ask is [glsl_alpha] a replacement for [alpha] or 
[pix_alpha]?
Best,
n

> texture_alpha / texture_add / ...
> vertex_random / ...

-- 
http://www.nimon.org