[PD-dev] moving GEM's non-graphic objects to pure-data.sf.net CVS

IOhannes zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.kug.ac.at
Mon Apr 28 17:30:34 CEST 2003

Ben Bogart wrote:
> This makes a lot of sense to me in the long run.
> Mark, why was markEx merged into Gem originally?
(being not Mark, but i think:) because it was easier: some of the 
example-patches depend on markEX, and it would have been very 
complicated if you had to get another library.
But of course:
markEX is not really Gem, and it certainly makes sense to put it into 
some separated space (like the CVS, although i don't think, lot's of 
people will continue development for markEX (?))
But then: should i remove markEX from Gem ? (again the problem with the 


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list