[PD-dev] autobuild for pd-devel
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Jul 12 12:29:13 CEST 2005
Tim Blechmann wrote:
>
> well, this depends if you see the ./configure file as a binary or a
> source file ...
>
> since it is a generated file containing between 5000 to 10000 lines, i'd
> consider it as a binary, that shouldn't be placed in a cvs repository
> (but that should be generated for source-tarballs)
i get you.
it is very ugly, that if i change configure.ac i have to submit both
configure and configure.ac.
however, it seems like it unnecessarily complicates the build-process
(due to the various conflicting versions of the autoconf-tools)
> although i thought, it' pretty easy to generate the autoconf file, i
> wrote the bootstrap stript ...
yes, i was always wondering what it is for, since it only does obvious
things. but then i am using autoconf more often then other users.
> anyway, it might be a waste of resources, to have python installed to
> build pd, the advantage of scons is the dependency tracking that is
> advanced compared to the autotools ... if you compile a lot, you will
> start to like the features ...
i do not doubt that it has its merits.
>
> cheers, tim, who feels like being in the middle of a flamewar ;-)
>
oops, i did it again!
sorry, this was not my intention.
mfg.a.sdr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list