[PD-dev] loadbang order

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Tim Blechmann wrote:

> it's like having an abstraction like this after the inlets:
> |inlet data|
> | |loadbang|
> | |flush(
> |/             
> |pipe infinity|
> |outlet data|
> misusing pipe as message queue ...

Why do you call it a misuse ?

> similar to gemheads ... this would solve about about 99.999% of the
> cases, unless someone uses loadbang f, where f is the lowest number
> represented by t_float / the lowest number that a pd patch can save...

Well I don't claim to protect the user against him/herself and using such 
numbers in loadbang priorities has to be a quite deliberate act *and* 
loadbang priorities don't propagate across .pd files so no person can
inflict that upon another.

> well, i somehow like to have a solution covering all cases ...

Which cases am I missing???

____________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada