[PD-dev] $0 in messages, was: [ pure-data-Patches-1405137 ] multiple $arg-expansion

[Thomas Grill]

Am 14.01.2006 um 20:09 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:

> Thomas Grill wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2006 um 20:40 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
>>> now that is most likely even cooler than the 
>>> abstraction-classname-binding...
>>>
>>> please do some testing...
>> Today, when doing a workshop with some pd newcomers i was once more 
>> embarassed about the tricks i needed to use $0 inside a message. 
>> Since $0 is special anyway, is there a real reason for it?
>
> do you mean, is there a reason for my patch, a reason for $0 or a 
> reason for $0 being "different" in messages?

the latter (your patch is great, although i'd like to have even more 
flexible $args-processing). Sorry for continuing in your thread.

best greetings,
Thomas